Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

I Got Rid of Some Clothes

August 28, 2010

After reading several articles about people who are wearing fewer items of clothing, or even going a year without buying any clothing, I was inspired to clean out my closet.

I went through my wardrobe with brutal honesty and precision, and ended up getting rid of about 1/3 of my clothes.

I don’t miss them!  Because the clothes I got rid of– I hadn’t worn many of them for six months to a year.  They were the clothes I pawed past each time I opened my dresser drawer looking for an outfit.  The shirts that looked nice but that I needed to wear a particularly uncomfortable bra with.  The skirts I never wore, but that someday I would be in the mood for.  The jeans I didn’t really like anymore, but that I might like someday.  Basically, they were the clothes I didn’t think I should get rid of, because they were in great shape– because I never wore them.

Now they’re gone!  When I open my drawers (which also open much easier now that they are not stuffed to the brim), I like 99% of the clothes I find in them.  It’s a great feeling.  I have fewer clothes than ever before– but I feel as though I have more clothes than ever before:  because I like all of the clothes I have.  I think actually appreciate each item of clothing more now, because it’s part of a smaller, sparer collection.

The last item of clothing I bought was in late July.  Although I tend to buy clothes in a thrift shop rather than retail, I still figure I’ll give myself 6 months of buying no new clothing of any kind, and see how if feels.  After all, I don’t NEED any more clothes.  I have plenty of clothes right now; enough to last me through at least six months; possible an entire year.  If I can make it that long more’s the better.

So far, getting rid of 1/3 of my clothes is one of the most practical, satisfying things I’ve done in a long time.

May 11, 2010

One of the reasons dogs are great is that they are made ebulliently happy by walking around.

It’s something we have in common! No wonder I love dogs.

Dogs are the best.

Astrology!

May 7, 2010

Akie, Jillian and I discussed Astrology in this week’s Perpetual Post.  It’s astrologicalicious!

MOLLY SCHOEMANN: I want to cast astrology aside scornfully, but it seems like every time the subject comes up, someone else I love and respect confesses that they are interested in it, and I feel a renewed justification in being curious.

It’s not that I spend that much time thinking about astrology; I don’t even know off the top of my head what the dates are for every sign.  (In fact I am always simultaneously impressed and alarmed at those people who CAN say things like, “Your birthday is August 27th?  So you’re a Virgo then, hmm…”)  Nor do I really pay attention to people’s birthdays being on the cusp or whether their moons are in the house of something or other.

Really, the only time I pay much attention to astrology is to match up my sign with the sign of the boy I’m interested in and/or dating.  Now that I have settled down and become engaged to a Scorpio I don’t do much astrologizing, having spent a slow afternoon at work a few years ago reading every account I could find about what Scorpios are like and whether they are a good match with a Taurus.  Most sources claim that they are, because they’re kind of opposites but both really intense or something like that.  As About.com states, “Scorpio has intuitive powers and Taurus is master of the 3-D physical world — as a team they can experiment in bringing visions into form.”  Exactly!  That pretty much describes an average Sunday morning in our house.

There are those who claim that the problem with astrology is that you can read any horoscope, whether or not it’s your own, and find ways to relate to it, and pick things out of it that you think can be applied to your own life.  This is probably true for me.  I can relate to the 10pm weatherman;  I can find something that applies to my own life in an online recipe for chutney.  I guess you could say I have boundary issues.  So in that way I am a perfect candidate to find astrology both extremely compelling and extremely full of lies.

Still, I love people who are openly excited about astrology and enjoy discussing it, even if they do so with a dose of deprecation.  Talking to someone like that about astrology is like finding a kindred spirit who isn’t afraid to get raunchy while telling you why she broke up with her ex.  It lets you settle into a certain comfort zone and it increases your expectations for the depth of the conversation.  You know you are in for a good time when you find someone who you love and respect but who is also not afraid to look you in the eye and say something like “The way you just stirred your coffee is SO like a Taurus!  Your moon must be in the house of Saturn this week.”

One of my best friends will confess an intense interest in astrology when pressed, but she knows how admitting that sounds to some, and she’s not afraid to use that fact to her advantage.  One night she got out of a bad date early by discussing her love of astrology.  “I’m a Pisces,” she told the guy.  “We tend to be needy and emotional—and we’re also very demanding.”  Needless to say, she never heard from him again.  Their love must not have been in the stars!  Score one for astrology.

Hooray for Thanksgiving!

November 26, 2009

Pumpkin Cheesecake? Check. Cranberry-Pecan Upside Down Cake? Check. Slightly inflated self-esteem from my sophisticated Thanksgiving dessert repertoire? Check.

Let’s just hope they travel well. We’ve got a 90 minute drive tomorrow with a big hairy dog.

Happy Thanksgiving everyone!

-Molly

PS: email me if you want either recipe, they both turned out very tasty!

A Good Man’s Name

November 23, 2009

Quick! I need a good man’s name for the guy in my novel.

It needs to be kind of old-fashioned, but also kind of rakish and sexy. Think Neo-Post Gothic Satirical Romance hero’s name. Also, like most men in that genre which I just made up, he’s kind of a bad guy too.

Names I’ve had so far but that just aren’t right:
William
Langdon
Carson
Alistair
Jasper

I’m on Jasper right now, and it’s not bad, but I feel like it could use more oomph. And I want to avoid a) names of boys I’ve known in my life, not that you guys know what those names are, and b) names that end in ‘s’, because I’m never sure how the possessive works with those names. It just always looks weird.

Also, the heroine’s name is Clara. So if it goes well with that name, more the better.

No you don’t want to read my novel, trust me.

Thanx for your help!

LOL.

NaNoWriMo!

November 15, 2009

As some of you may know, this month I am participating in National Novel Writing Month, or NaNoWriMo.

This means that I am attempting to write a 50,000 word novel during the month of November.

What!

I only learned about the existence of NaNoWriMo last Friday. And I only really started my novel…today. So far I have just under 2,000 words. But I’m sallying forth! It’s a really neat idea, and awesome website and what appears to be a kickass community of other crazy writers. It feels very exciting to be working on this giant project at the same time as all these other equally enthusiastic and terrified writers, and it makes you feel much less alone to know that everyone else is struggling toward the same goal as you, just in all sorts of different ways.

But what I like best about the idea of NaNoWriMo is that it gives you a hard and fast deadline and goal, and urges you to just WRITE WRITE WRITE and not worry about it. You can edit later, you can freak out later, you can criticize and judge every little sentence you write and word you choose…LATER! For now, just write write write.  While reminds me of how I used to feel when I was younger and the only thing I ever wanted to do was have peace and quiet and time alone at the computer so I could write and enjoy every minute of it.

So far it’s been pretty freaking awesome! But I might be a little scarce on the blog over the next 2 weeks. Now you know why! And if you’re doing NaNoWriMo too, look me up! My username is Couriernew.

Texting While Driving

September 10, 2009

Howard and I took on Texting vs. Drinking while driving in the Perpetual Post.

_________________________

In the brief history of cell phones, has there ever been a critical text message?  One which actually helped to avert a crisis?  Not a ‘your ex is at the party!!’ crisis.  I’m talking a genuine disaster, prevented by a buzzing cell phone with a postage-stamp-sized message of 160 characters or less?  No.  I’m pretty sure not.  They don’t even use that shit on 24.  If Jack Bauer needs to let someone know that a building is about to explode unless they cut the blue wire, he calls.

This is why I am unsympathetic toward texting while driving:  because it’s never urgent.  At the very least, it’s never more urgent than not crashing your car.  Is there anything you might need to say via text message that can’t wait until you are no longer responsible for keeping a moving vehicle from hitting anything?

Or maybe you text in the car because you’re bored.  Is just plain driving not interesting enough anymore?  Watching the scenery hurtle past you at 60mph while other cars weave in and out of your way doesn’t hold your attention the way it used to?  Then pull over.  Maybe you’ll like walking better.  Because you’ll be doing a more lot of that when you flip your car over a median because you were texting to let your friend know that you’ve been thinking of trying out for The Amazing Race.  Actually, scratch that.  At that point, you’ll be thrilled if you’re walking.

Before I continue to get my crabby geezer on, I would like to note that I am a huge fan of texting.  I don’t really know what I like about it so much; but since I manage to send about nine million texts a month, there must be something about the format that appeals to me.  Still, even when a blinding flash of brilliance strikes while I’m in traffic and I feel the overwhelming urge to express it to someone via text, I hold my thumbs.

I’m not saying it’s easy.  We as a society are accustomed to multitasking to the point of utter uselessness, and we have conditioned ourselves to expect instant gratification.  We want same day delivery and 24 hour customer service.  We put pizza on a bagel so we can eat pizza anytime.  Nobody listens to voicemails anymore; even text messaging is apparently beginning to fall by the wayside as people begin to IM each other through their phones.

But there are still some things you have to wait for, and texting, if you’re driving, is one of them.  Just like you have to wait until you get out of the tub to use your hair dryer.  Some things are just so dangerous that they’re not worth doing in the instant they occur to you.  Unless it’s worth risking life and limb to let your old roommate know that it’s Shark Week, wait until you get where you’re going.

In the brief history of cell phones, has there ever been a critical text message?  One which actually helped to avert a crisis?  Not a ‘your ex is at the party!!’ crisis.  I’m talking a genuine disaster, prevented by a buzzing cell phone with a postage-stamp-sized message of 160 characters or less?  No.  I’m pretty sure not.  They don’t even use that shit on 24.  If Jack Bauer needs to let someone know that a building is about to explode unless they cut the blue wire, he calls.
This is why I am unsympathetic toward texting while driving:  because it’s never urgent.  At the very least, it’s never more urgent than not crashing your car.  Is there anything you might need to say via text message that can’t wait until you are no longer responsible for keeping a moving vehicle from hitting anything?
Or maybe you text in the car because you’re bored.  Is just plain driving not interesting enough anymore?  Watching the scenery hurtle past you at 60mph while other cars weave in and out of your way doesn’t hold your attention the way it used to?  Then pull over.  Maybe you’ll like walking better.  Because you’ll be doing a more lot of that when you flip your car over a median because you were texting to let your friend know that you’ve been thinking of trying out for The Amazing Race.  Actually, scratch that.  At that point, you’ll be thrilled if you’re walking.
Before I continue to get my crabby geezer on, I would like to note that I am a huge fan of texting.  I don’t really know what I like about it so much; but since I manage to send about nine million texts a month, there must be something about the format that appeals to me.  Still, even when a blinding flash of brilliance strikes while I’m in traffic and I feel the overwhelming urge to express it to someone via text, I hold my thumbs.
I’m not saying it’s easy.  We as a society are accustomed to multitasking to the point of utter uselessness, and we have conditioned ourselves to expect instant gratification.  We want same day delivery and 24 hour customer service.  We put pizza on a bagel so we can eat pizza anytime.  Nobody listens to voicemails anymore; even text messaging is apparently beginning to fall by the wayside as people begin to IM each other through their phones.
But there are still some things you have to wait for, and texting, if you’re driving, is one of them.  Just like you have to wait until you get out of the tub to use your hair dryer.  Some things are just so dangerous that they’re not worth doing in the instant they occur to you.  Unless it’s worth risking life and limb to let your old roommate know that it’s Shark Week, wait until you get where you’re going.

Is Google Making Us Stupid?

August 28, 2009
I’ve spent countless carefree, enjoyable hours surfing the internet, but if there were a way to add all of that time up and show me exactly how much of my sweet life I’ve wasted reading gossip blogs and msn.com relationship advice, I would probably weep and throw myself off a cliff.  I know that at this point I’ve spent months of my life playing around on the internet.  Maybe even years.  YEARS spent staring at a glowing screen and scrolling through photos of celebrities clambering out of limos.  What have I really gained from all of that restless, pointless clicking and endless consumption of cheap news and useless information?  Where did the time go?  Can I have it back?  If I could have it back, wouldn’t I just waste it in a similarly pointless, trivial manner?  Or would I write the great American novel?
I guess the definition of a waste of time is different for everyone.  However unlikely, there may be some who bemoan the years they frittered away reading Joyce, seeking spiritual enlightenment and spending time with their children.  Still, my definition of a waste of time is unfortunately going to have to include the hours I’ve spent watching videos of cats playing with boxes, reading reviews of terrible 80s movies, and searching for pictures of Basking sharks (because have you seen those things?!).  And I have the power of Google to thank for most of those experiences.
An article on The Atlantic.com called ‘Is Google Making Us Stupid’ suggested that the ease with which the internet allows us to move quickly from one thing to another is rewiring us to be less able to focus on one thing for long periods of time.  I didn’t finish the article but it looked interesting.  Anyway I’ll finish writing this in a minute.  First I’m going to go check my bank balance online.  While I’m doing that, I will remember that I wanted to buy this recipe book on Amazon, and once I’m on their website I will be sidetracked by a link to a fabulous quiche recipe.  Then I’ll Google ‘quiche recipe’ to see if I can find a better one, which will remind me that I’ve always wondered how long it takes for eggs to go bad, which will lead me to a video of a dancing chicken, which will lead me to a video of a dancing robot, which will remind me of this website I used to visit that had comics about robots, and when I get to that website I will remember that I meant to email an old friend who likes robots.  But before I get to that, I want to read a movie review of Tron, and I’m hoping that review will totally slam it, so I go to The Onion AV club, which reminds me that I haven’t read Dan Savage in awhile, so I’ll catch up on the last few months of his sex advice columns, at which point I look at the clock and realize I’ve spent three hours staring at the computer with very little to show for it.  And I could have been playing with the dog, or making a quiche, or calling my grandmother just to say hi.
I’m not going to claim that the internet has never taught me anything.  It is thanks to Google that I’ve learned how to grow windowbox herbs and discovered that Timothy Olyphant from “Die Hard 4” also played the drug dealer in “Go”.  The internet is incredible in its real-time validation of the most insignificant of my urges and thoughts.  The faintest blip of an idea can lead me to far-reaching websites and galaxies of discovery.  The problem is, with all of this information at my fingertips, my mind seems to be turning into a colander, and surfing the internet is like dipping it into the ocean.  When I re-emerge from my internet travels, all the glorious trivia and minutia I’ve gathered over the hours immediately drains out and I forget all of the wonderful knowledge I’ve spent hours skimming over.  Occasionally a small silvery fish will be left flopping in the colander—a rare fact that I’ve actually managed to retain—and it’s usually either the day’s weather forecast or something about Britney Spears.
Recently I’ve been trying to finish doing one thing at a time online before I move on to the next.  This seems simple, but somehow it’s become incredibly difficult, perhaps because my mind is trained at this point to expect the instant gratification of every random whim that occurs to me while I’m in the middle of something that’s maybe not holding my attention perfectly.  Perhaps I’m apartment hunting online or researching credit scores.  Suddenly it will occur to me that I want to see a picture of that dress whats-her-face wore to the Oscars that one year—and BAM!  That is enough of an incentive for me to drop what I’m doing and kneel at the shrine of Google.  And when I find that actress’s dress, it might lead me to one of my favorite fashion blogs, and before I know it, an hour’s gone by and all of the good apartments are taken.  And my credit score is still in the toilet.
It’s not been easy making this change, and I haven’t done nearly as well as I would have liked (while writing this article I Googled several different unrelated subjects, including the goblin sharks and the history of the Sapphire) but I’m getting there.  And someday, when I’m old and I’m the only one at the card table who can play more than one round of gin rummy without wandering off to watch breakdancing videos on YouTube or surf for pancake recipes, maybe my brain will thank me.

Howard and I took this topic on in Friday’s  Perpetual Post:

I’ve spent countless carefree, enjoyable hours surfing the internet, but if there were a way to add all of that time up and show me exactly how much of my sweet life I’ve wasted reading gossip blogs and msn.com relationship advice, I would probably weep and throw myself off a cliff.  I know that at this point I’ve spent months of my life playing around on the internet.  Maybe even years.  YEARS spent staring at a glowing screen and scrolling through photos of celebrities clambering out of limos.  What have I really gained from all of that restless, pointless clicking and endless consumption of cheap news and useless information?  Where did the time go?  Can I have it back?  If I could have it back, wouldn’t I just waste it in a similarly pointless, trivial manner?  Or would I write the great American novel?

I guess the definition of a waste of time is different for everyone.  However unlikely, there may be some who bemoan the years they frittered away reading Joyce, seeking spiritual enlightenment and spending time with their children.  Still, my definition of a waste of time is unfortunately going to have to include the hours I’ve spent watching videos of cats playing with boxes, reading reviews of terrible 80s movies, and searching for pictures of Basking sharks (because have you seen those things?!).  And I have the power of Google to thank for most of those experiences.

An article on The Atlantic.com called ‘Is Google Making Us Stupid’ suggested that the ease with which the internet allows us to move quickly from one thing to another is rewiring us to be less able to focus on one thing for long periods of time.  I didn’t finish the article but it looked interesting.  Anyway I’ll finish writing this in a minute.  First I’m going to go check my bank balance online.  While I’m doing that, I will remember that I wanted to buy this recipe book on Amazon, and once I’m on their website I will be sidetracked by a link to a fabulous quiche recipe.  Then I’ll Google ‘quiche recipe’ to see if I can find a better one, which will remind me that I’ve always wondered how long it takes for eggs to go bad, which will lead me to a video of a dancing chicken, which will lead me to a video of a dancing robot, which will remind me of this website I used to visit that had comics about robots, and when I get to that website I will remember that I meant to email an old friend who likes robots.  But before I get to that, I want to read a movie review of Tron, and I’m hoping that review will totally slam it, so I go to The Onion AV club, which reminds me that I haven’t read Dan Savage in awhile, so I’ll catch up on the last few months of his sex advice columns, at which point I look at the clock and realize I’ve spent three hours staring at the computer with very little to show for it.  And I could have been playing with the dog, or making a quiche, or calling my grandmother just to say hi.

I’m not going to claim that the internet has never taught me anything.  It is thanks to Google that I’ve learned how to grow windowbox herbs and discovered that Timothy Olyphant from “Die Hard 4” also played the drug dealer in “Go”.  The internet is incredible in its real-time validation of the most insignificant of my urges and thoughts.  The faintest blip of an idea can lead me to far-reaching websites and galaxies of discovery.  The problem is, with all of this information at my fingertips, my mind seems to be turning into a colander, and surfing the internet is like dipping it into the ocean.  When I re-emerge from my internet travels, all the glorious trivia and minutia I’ve gathered over the hours immediately drains out and I forget all of the wonderful knowledge I’ve spent hours skimming over.  Occasionally a small silvery fish will be left flopping in the colander—a rare fact that I’ve actually managed to retain—and it’s usually either the day’s weather forecast or something about Britney Spears.

Recently I’ve been trying to finish doing one thing at a time online before I move on to the next.  This seems simple, but somehow it’s become incredibly difficult, perhaps because my mind is trained at this point to expect the instant gratification of every random whim that occurs to me while I’m in the middle of something that’s maybe not holding my attention perfectly.  Perhaps I’m apartment hunting online or researching credit scores.  Suddenly it will occur to me that I want to see a picture of that dress whats-her-face wore to the Oscars that one year—and BAM!  That is enough of an incentive for me to drop what I’m doing and kneel at the shrine of Google.  And when I find that actress’s dress, it might lead me to one of my favorite fashion blogs, and before I know it, an hour’s gone by and all of the good apartments are taken.  And my credit score is still in the toilet.

It’s not been easy making this change, and I haven’t done nearly as well as I would have liked (while writing this article I Googled several different unrelated subjects, including the goblin sharks and the history of the Sapphire) but I’m getting there.  And someday, when I’m old and I’m the only one at the card table who can play more than one round of gin rummy without wandering off to watch breakdancing videos on YouTube or surf for pancake recipes, maybe my brain will thank me.

The Grey Gardens Remake: A Non-Review

April 26, 2009

“It’s very difficult to keep the line between the past and the present, you know what I mean?”

–Edith Bouvier Beale

I was first introduced to Grey Gardens by a friend of mine who had seen it dozens of times and quoted it often.  He said I absolutely had to see it, that it would change my life.  While it was difficult for me to watch all the way through the first time, and I still have trouble getting through the whole thing whenever I watch it again, Grey Gardens is unforgettable.  I think everyone should see it.

When the musical came out, I was oh so excited.  My parents got me tickets to it for my birthday, and I highly enjoyed it (although the first act, which is not based on the movie, I could take or leave).  The flamboyant and yet painfully intimate documentary film was well suited for the adaptation to Broadway musical.  The addition of musical numbers did not seem glaringly out of place, since the documentary itself was alive with music and dance.  The portrayal of the Beales on the stage was thoughtful and nuanced; loving yet honest.

Given that the Broadway musical was such a smash hit, I should not be surprised that a film remake of the original documentary, as was recently shown on HBO, soon followed.  Truthfully, I can almost understand the desire to remake Grey Gardens; a work of such brilliance is sure to inspire its share of devoted followers, and imitation is the sincerest form of flattery and all that.

While I have come out against film remakes in the past, I don’t doubt that at least some fraction of them are made not with profit in mind but out of love and devotion to the original.  When you remake a fictional film, even if it’s based on true events, you are in effect re-telling a story that was originally told using actors and a set and a script.  Your version of Bonnie & Clyde may underline different themes and play up ideas that were less obvious in the original, and that’s fine.  Your take is different, but it is recreated under the same circumstances as the original film, and in that regard, your version is just as legitimate.

Remaking a documentary, on the other hand, is not only ludicrous, but also pointless.  How can you play up ideas that weren’t sufficiently developed during the original documentary of Grey Gardens, when all of the ideas and themes that existed in the original were introduced by the actual people themselves?  Edie Beale and her mother were not actresses.  They were performers, certainly, but they were not playing roles.  They were being themselves-their own glorious, crazy, tragic selves.  Why on earth would I ever want to watch two actresses attempt to portray the Beales, when I can watch the actual Beales?  What aspects of their incredible lives could ever be better illuminated by an actor’s mimicry?

Both Little Edie and Big Edie are dead now, and both died in poverty, having seen little financial reward for starring in an incredibly popular documentary that laid bare the trappings of their astonishing lives.  In one sense, I understand that a remake of Grey Gardens is supposed to serve as an homage to the Beales.  But in a more real sense, I see it as a ghastly exploitation; replicating a documentary that itself bordered on exploitation, no matter how iconic and successful it became in the end.  Let these two fearless, haunting women have the last word; see the original Grey Gardens, and skip the remake.  As a devoted fan of the original, I plan to.

On Twitter.

April 24, 2009

I am convinced that if I were locked away in solitary with no contact with the outside world except for Twitter, it would STILL irritate me.